This experience was just fantastic for helping develop my
practice. I was so thankful for your kind comments and thoughtful feedback. I
have begun to implement more authentic assessment into my daily routine and I
am gaining a better understanding of what the children are retaining. Thank
you!
2. Did the
students learn what I had intended? Were my instructional goals and
objectives developmentally appropriate? What is my evidence?
I believe that the students did
learn what I had intended them to learn. The objective of the lesson was “After reading an informational
text and observing a pumpkin, children will demonstrate knowledge of a
pumpkin’s physical attributes and parts.” I was able to observe the children
use some of the pumpkin vocabulary during the art activity (i.e. “look how many
seeds I have”). This indicated that the children were able to identify and
apply knowledge of a pumpkin’s parts. I think the lesson was developmentally
appropriate because it built on what the children had been learning and
included a few more challenging terms. This was apparent in the children’s interest
and engagement. I was especially happy with the lesson when Ryota, our usually
quiet ELL student, repeated the targeted vocabulary “fibrous strands”.
4. Were my strategies and activities effective? What
is my evidence?
I think my strategies and
activities were effective because there was a variety of learning experiences
including a read aloud, a discussion, a sensory experience, and a hands-on art
activity. The children were engaged and enjoyed each activity which increased
their interest in learning the new terminology introduced. During the art
activity one child asked for the term ‘fibrous strands’ to be repeated, after
which several other children repeated the term. Ms. Christina reported that the
term was reintroduced the following day, which helped fortify the vocabulary
introduced.
7. If I had the opportunity to teach
this lesson again, what might I do differently? Why?
If I did this lesson again I would allow the students more free range with the art materials and I would approach the assessment portion differently the following day. Using open-ended questions such as, “What is important about pumpkins?” I can authentically assess what the children learned and where more practice is needed. Giving children more free-range with the art material would have also allowed for more creativity and insight into what the children remembered about pumpkins. I would also prepare larger experience chart paper to record and preserve the children’s thoughts about how a pumpkin looks, smells, tastes, feels and sounds like. I might also break up the 5 senses and discuss 1-2 per day over a few days, reviewing our thoughts from each discussion daily.
If I did this lesson again I would allow the students more free range with the art materials and I would approach the assessment portion differently the following day. Using open-ended questions such as, “What is important about pumpkins?” I can authentically assess what the children learned and where more practice is needed. Giving children more free-range with the art material would have also allowed for more creativity and insight into what the children remembered about pumpkins. I would also prepare larger experience chart paper to record and preserve the children’s thoughts about how a pumpkin looks, smells, tastes, feels and sounds like. I might also break up the 5 senses and discuss 1-2 per day over a few days, reviewing our thoughts from each discussion daily.
No comments:
Post a Comment